The site uses cookies that you may not want. Continued use means acceptance. For more information see our privacy policy.

Worst Consensus Ever.

The concur/dissent tally from a recent US Supreme Court decision is highly fractured to the point of being utterly silly.

SOUTER, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the
opinion of the Court, except as to Part III–B. STEVENS and BREYER, JJ.,
joined that opinion in full; ROBERTS, C. J., and GINSBURG, J., joined all
but Part III–B; and SCALIA, J., joined all but Parts III–B and IV. STE-
VENS, J., filed a concurring opinion. ROBERTS, C. J., and SCALIA, J., filed
opinions concurring in part. THOMAS, J., filed an opinion concurring in
the judgment. KENNEDY, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ALITO,
J., joined. ALITO, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Add a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Post navigation