The site uses cookies that you may not want. Continued use means acceptance. For more information see our privacy policy.

Where Be Wrath Upon the Liars?

The answer to the question of what consequences will befall the lawless right is karma.

Something that comes up repeatedly in the era of Donald John Trump is the lack of accountability and consequences for the brazen and nefarious lies that he and his minions have spewed and continue to spew. The cry goes out, “Will they not be punished?!”

Ah, but karma does not work that way. Karma works this way: the punishments will come, in the future. The liars may be among those punished. Or their children. Or their friends. Or complete strangers. But there is no definitive way to say who will receive the punishments of the karma they have created through their lies. That would be too easy.

We can hazard some guesses, though.

The Republican party will be punished. As we will keep hearing about this era for the rest of our lives, and as new and horrid details will continue to bubble up from this poisonous bog long after even the staunchest of the brainiacs who now support Donald John Trump have soured on hearing his very name, the heads will again and again turn to the Republicans and ask, “How could you do nothing?!”

The future will be punished by fallout from these years. Loss of trust, weakening of international institutions, strengthening of despotic regimes, and more will have lasting effects causing us to spend more time and money and effort to build and keep a useful world for humans to prosper in. The future will turn to the Republicans and ask them that same question. And those of them who have to fight to keep the peace in foreign lands squeezed in the vices of famine and drought, they too will pose similar questions to the nation and to the Republicans particularly.

And you and I. We will be punished. For we will have to hear about every last shitty thing done in the name of the United States by Donald John Trump and his ilk. We will be punished with the knowledge that we’re spending time cleaning up rather than making new strides. Knowing we live in a country less than it could be for the lamest of reasons. And we will have to hear the same question posed to the Republicans every single year from here to our ends. And we will have to listen to their sorry excuses or their new lies:

  • I did not support him.
  • We didn’t know it was so.
  • We were afraid of losing our seats.
  • We were confirming so many judges, it was like a drug.
  • We were blinded by his lies.
  • We were addled by our sleeping pills.
  • The liberals were so annoying that we thought it was good to make them angry.
  • It was a fad we all bought into at the time, like bellbottoms or hoola hoops.
  • We thought the whole universe was a simulation.
  • Donald who?

And so on.

Yes, there are consequences. There is karma. There will be punishments, irregularly distributed, to the innocent as well as the guilty. Such is life. It is self-correcting, on a long enough timeline, bending toward justice as the wicked are found out, as the ignorant are disabused, and as the rest of us stare on, baffled and disgusted but seemingly incapable of escape from these sick and sad mysteries.

“Karma’s a big dummy,” I hear you say. “It shouldn’t work that way at all.” But that’s like saying gravity is a dummy. Karma is. It’s a force, not a judge.

Reputation Systems: An Essay

A brief essay I wrote about the future of the internet and the need for a reputation system.


I take it as fact that a programmatic (as opposed to ad hoc) reputation system will be one of the next major undertakings for the net. To me the question is now just a matter of what that system should look like.


The justification for a reputation is relatively straightforward. Phishing, spam, and other forms of fraud would be greatly diminished. The signal-to-noise ratio would be improved if you could look at a little graphic next to the results on Google and know that people think that site rocks or think that site is lousy. Same thing for news sites like Digg and Slashdot. For that random e-mail: you don’t know if it’s worth looking at, but it’s signed. What do others think of that person? They think that person is spam? Delete.

Existing Systems

Before we proceed with my opinion on that matter, a brief overview of some of the existing systems:

PKI Web of Trust

The PKI “Web of Trust” model is the closest thing to a distributed reputation system that I am aware of. It is directed at validating the keys rather than the reputation of the key’s owner. Having signing as part of a more general system would be useful, though.


eBay and other similar sites have a reputation system for the buyers and sellers. It works okay. It is not distributed (each node sees one piece of data, the rating, and the individual feedback that contributed to that rating). Being centralized means that gaming the system is easier. There is one model of trust, although different people can ascribe different weight to that model.


Slashdot uses a moderation system as well as karma. The more highly you are moderated, the better your karma. It has also introduced a friend/fan/foe/freak system allowing you to give a single designation (neutral/friend/foe) to another user as well as see their designation of you. They also display friend-of-a-fried and foe-of-a-friend data.

This works nice within the bounds of the comment system, but you cannot friend/foe the editors, sites, etc. And it’s exclusive to Slashdot, so you can’t see a Slashdot friend automatically on Digg, for example.


The Domain Name System also has reputation built into it. The dozen-or-so root Nameservers are trusted to provide accurate information. The TLD Nameservers are the same way. You trust that the information is accurate. This is also true of routing tables. The difference here is that DNS suffers from gaming in the form of domain squatters.

A Net-wide Reputation System?

That is what I am proposing. It will not supplant the DNS system or the PKI Web of Trust, but such a system would eventually either integrate with or supplant most other general-purpose systems.

Unique IDs

OpenIDs give you a unique identifier to tag with reputation data and build a graph off of. The same goes for websites. E-mail is a little trickier by the very nature of being able to spoof the from: address. That is, until you augment it with encryption and the e-mails become signed.


My assumption is we can build a graph and more or less crawl that reputation graph to discover how well you might want to trust someone or something from the get-go. You could then add to your graph your own reputation data for that entity, which would affect its reputation for those who give you credence.

And of course, if you found the system’s rating wasn’t accurate you would be able to crawl the graph and prune any parts that weren’t giving you accurate results.


I believe it is time to start work on a reputation system for the internet. I believe the existing technologies can be integrated with a system and that it will benefit the average user of the internet immensely. While I have some more technical ideas of how to do it, I am very interested in hearing the feedback of others. This is particularly true of those working on similar/related problems such as data portability.

Thank you for taking the time to read this, and I hope it will entice some useful ideas about reputations.