The site uses cookies that you may not want. Continued use means acceptance. For more information see our privacy policy.

The Ugly Parts of History.

The bad parts tell us why we have the good at all. We must learn the bad to keep the good.

In the Bible we are told that the first two humans messed everything up by having a snack in the garden. And awhile later things were so crap that there was a flood to wipe everything away except for one big zoo boat. And so on. Most history, real or religious, is taught good and (mostly) bad.

Even in American history we learn, for example, that the King of Great Britain circa 1776 was a jerk who was screwing with the people living in what would become America. Nobody says we can’t teach kids that he was a bad guy. Why? Because we teach kids that the founders, the people who created the nation, did so in reaction to that bad stuff. They learned from the mistakes of the monarch, and the mistakes of the British system and of the Colonial governments, to create a better system.

We don’t spend much time on the Articles of Confederation. They weren’t very good. We should spend more time on them, because they weren’t very good. The new Americans had to go write a new Constitution after only eight years (and three days; ratified 1781, where the Constitution was in 1789). That’s how much they screwed it up the first time.

The bulk of history is one of two stories:

  1. People learned from mistakes and made something better. Yay!
  2. People didn’t learn and suffered because of it. Oh no!

Actually, it’s mostly the latter. History is nearly a synonym for mistakes.

When we learn about the racist historical activities, about slavery and Jim Crow, or about sexist historical activities that led to a fight for women’s suffrage, or about dumb economic mistakes, the cycles of depressions leading up to the Great Depression, or the dumb wars of conquest including the World Wars, or the abysmal labor practices that led to the labor rights movement and the civil rights movement, we’re learning as much about the present as the past. We’re learning why things are the way they are. We learn how they changed, why they changed. But we also learn about human nature.

The big lesson of the founding era is about power. It’s about pitting power against power in order to keep any one person or group of people from being able to screw things up too badly. They saw what a tyrannical king could do, and they rejected it in their design. But they also had their own power factions, one of which was the southern states with lots of slaves. Parts of the Constitution were written because of distrust between the new states, including over slavery. (Because, honestly, how much could you trust someone who claims to own another human being?)

Yes, you have to learn about racism. You have to learn how wicked man can be when they ignore the better angels. But that lesson isn’t something like “White people are devils and must be watched,” just like Black people aren’t either. The lesson is that people are apt to do some bad shit, out of stupidity more often than malice, if we don’t watch out. The saying is that “power corrupts.” It’s not “don’t mix power with white guys.” The power does the corrupting.

I mention that because some conservatives seem to want to believe history teaches a racist message. And they say they don’t want to teach it, because they don’t want that message to be learned. I don’t believe that’s what history shows, and I think anyone who concludes that is misreading history.

Sometimes power does non-racially-motivated things. Like ban alcohol for a few years, drunkenly chasing some utopian dream only to find it a drastic failure and quickly reamending the Constitution. Oops. Power is dumb and brutal. We must spread it out among many people, lest we do things completely insane on the regular.

Power wants to protect itself. The various Inquisitions of the churches were all about the power of the church. In modern contexts, things like the Red Scare or the Benghazi inquiries or Donald John Trump trying to get cooked investigations going in Ukraine, we know it to be true that power and the quest to seize or maintain power, are corrupting. These things weren’t racist, but they were still corrupt exercises of power.

But if you don’t teach kids the full and proper history, you end up with some historical rhymes that nobody wants. Like anti-vaccination crap that allows diseases to maim and kill, because people don’t remember and weren’t taught how bad the diseases were. You get generations deprived the vote and decent education and decent jobs, cycles of poverty and misery, if people don’t know that stealing the vote creates power imbalances that coil themselves around the throat of society and squeeze. Like businesses that get away with moving jobs around like Three-card Monte, to prevent workers from having decent working conditions. We teach labor history so that people will know they have a right to decent working conditions. Like climate change causing massive ecological destruction and social strife, if a bunch of executives never learned environmental history like Love Canal and the Ozone Hole.

And kids need to know why we have three branches of government, not just have this weird phrase “checks and balances” echo in their head, but actually demonstrate it, understand that if the checks and balances get unbalanced, if one scoundrel seizes enough power, it’s a bad time.

The Republicans and others who run away from history, like all those idiots in the past did, will find it ends badly. The world will suffer for their cowardice. And we’ll write all about it in the next edition.

To Fix College Admissions

On the notion that college admission should be random.

I’m already sick of reading about the fraud-in-admissions scandal, but figure that solutions are useful. There are a few things to note about colleges.

Foremost, it’s ridiculous that something as basic as education gets turned into a brand and prestige commodity. It’s basically a celebration of ignorance to prefer someone who learned the same material at a pricey school over someone who learned it elsewhere. If the educational standards at Megabucks U are really that superior, they should be adopted by other institutions. If not, we should stop pretending that the Latin motto matters.

Second, qualifications only matter to a point. If you have two otherwise-identical students and you’re down to weighing the choice of their musical instrument (“E plays harmonica, but e plays the mandolin. Which of those is more of the Megabucks sound?”), fuck off. And the broader situation holds, as well. Qualifications should be about whether someone has the educational background necessary to succeed, and not about chest medals.

With those two things in mind, the way that college admissions (and other things like hiring choices) ought to work is simple:

  1. Select out the qualified candidates.
  2. Randomize that list.

Simple. Unbiased. No-nonsense.

That includes legacy, wing-donors, whatever. It includes minority-preference, scholarship, whatever. Pick them at random. Unless you have very small class sizes or very bad luck, you’ll get a diverse selection that includes the offspring of megadonors as well as underprivileged applicants.

One of the big problems for Megabucks U is that the big donors actually reduce school competition and the spread of education. Rather than franchising or otherwise spreading curricula to others, in hopes of raising more money for the institution, Megabucks will spend more effort protecting its stupid name-brand. The same problem exists in politics, where overreliance on megadonors limits the political oxygen available for a party or a politician to make reasonable choices.

If a Republican megadonor doesn’t like the idea of wind power because e thinks it will mess up eir hairdo, suddenly the Republicans have to oppose wind power, even if their constituents favor it. That sucks. It’s anti-democratic. It can go screw.

Welcome to the Trump Years

Good luck, Trump. You have a lot to do if you want America to earn the adjective “great.”

Officially, now, Donald John Trump the First is the 45th President of the United States of America. He has 1460 days to make America great again, which means:

  • Raising 30,000 people up from poverty per day
  • Legalize and stabilize some 7500 undocumented immigrants per day
  • Rehabilitate and release some 1500 state and federal prisoners per day
  • See 17,000 undereducated individuals achieve at least a GED per day
  • Employ or improve the employment of 11,200 unemployed or underemployed persons per day
  • Repair or replace 41 bridges per day, among other infrastructure improvements needed
  • Cut the carbon emissions another 1.25% per year to reach the 17% reduction from 2005 levels by 2020

And so on.

It will not be an easy task, and it will be all the harder for the resistance to greatness that the Republican party loyalists in Congress cling to. They seek not to address these problems with an eye to solution, but instead to focus on limited agendas to improve the bottom lines of a few corporations.

If President Trump truly wants to make America great, he will have to stave off the legislative assassins who will gut any real reforms he might seek.

Greatness is not a measure of the stock market. It is not found on balance sheets. It is quantifiable, but only in the quantity of humans who are prosperous. And prosperous not for a day, a week, a month, a year, or a presidential term, but for their lives. For their children’s lives. And on down the road.

If President Trump does not address the measures above, and others, he will not have succeeded in making America great. He will be held to that standard by history. He can either go down as another in a line of those he would say to, “You had four years, and yet you did not succeed.”

It is a weighty task. There is much to be done. But it is doable. It has always been doable. It will take a lot of work, but any president that is willing to put in the effort can achieve great things.

So, go ahead, punk. Make America great. I dare Trump. I double-dog dare Trump. What is Trump, a chicken? Bok-bok!

Whatever happened during the 2016 election, Trump is now president. He ran to make the country great, to shed the shrouds that have weakened us. Now he must perform.